Vol. 1 · Edition 023Free · No paywall

Everyone Needs a Samwise

AI news · Synthesized · Opinionated · 🌿

1B
monthly AI Mode users
Google Search · May 26, 2026
Product
By Sam Taylor with Samwise

On the end of ten blue links, what conversational search means for your daily Google habit, and why publishers are quietly panicking.

Google changed the search box you've used for 25 years. Here's what's different now.

Source lean on this story
▲ avg

Anti-AI

00

Skeptic

02

Neutral

00

Pro (practical)

01

Pro (hyped)

01

← Anti-AI · Pro-AI →

If you Googled anything in the last week — a recipe, a restaurant, what a medical term means, whether a store is still open — what came up first probably looked a little different than it would have a year ago.

That's not an accident. On May 26, 2026, Google made AI Mode the global default for all Search users. Not a tab you opt into. Not a beta for people who like fiddling with settings. The default, for everyone. The list of ten blue links that has been how most people experience "the internet" since roughly 1998 is still there — but it's now the second thing you see, not the first.

The first thing you see is an AI-written answer to your question, generated by Gemini 3.5 Flash, Google's most recent AI model. Below that are the links. The search bar at the top grew bigger and now prompts you to ask longer, more specific questions rather than typing three-word keyword summaries.

Google is calling this the biggest redesign of the Search box in over 25 years.

1B
Monthly active users on Google AI Mode at the moment it became the global default, May 26, 2026

→ Source: Google Blog, I/O 2026

Source spread

What's real:

The search bar itself changed. Not a new feature on top of the old box — the box is wider, taller, and now suggests longer questions. Google says AI Mode queries are three times longer on average than traditional searches. That number tells you people are actually using the format, not just encountering it and typing the same keywords they always did.

Follow-up questions work now. Here's the one I think most people will feel in daily life. Old Google: search for "best running shoes," get ten links, open four tabs, read four different articles, extract an answer. New Google: ask "best running shoes for flat feet under $150," get an answer, then immediately ask "which of those come in wide widths?" without losing the conversation. Follow-up queries are up 40% month over month. The feature is being used.

The box can now take a photo, a file, or a video. You can hold up your phone at a plant, take a picture, and ask "what is this and should I repot it?" The old search box was text only. The new one is multimodal — a term meaning it accepts multiple kinds of input. About 16% of AI Mode searches are already multimodal.

Blue links are not gone. I want to be clear about this because I've seen it framed badly. The traditional list of websites is still there. It's just lower on the page, below the AI answer. Think of it as Google adding a floor above the level you were already on.

The search box, across 25 years
  1. 1998–2024

    Ten blue links

    Type keywords, get a ranked list of websites. Unchanged for roughly a quarter century.

  2. Early 2025

    AI Overviews

    AI-generated snippet above the links, opt-in only. Most users had to find the tab.

  3. May 19, 2026

    I/O announcement

    Google announces the full redesign — new box, Gemini 3.5 Flash default, conversational search. Biggest change in 25 years.

  4. May 26, 2026

    Global default

    AI Mode becomes the default for everyone, everywhere. Blue links still there; AI answer goes first.

What deserves a side-eye:

Sixty percent of searches now end without clicking anything. That's the number The Next Web reported: sixty percent of Google searches are now "zero-click," meaning Google answers the question and the user never visits a website. When that happens, the website that would have gotten your click gets nothing. HubSpot estimates it lost 70–80% of its organic search traffic. Chegg reported a 49% decline. These are large numbers from large organizations.

Here's the thing I think deserves plain language: the AI answer you got was built by training on content from websites. When those websites can't sustain themselves because nobody clicks through, some of them close. Others cut costs and get worse. The system that replaced the click was built on the writing those websites produced. That's not a loop that resolves cleanly.

The answer could be wrong and you might not notice. The old list of links showed you sources immediately; you could scan the names and decide whether to trust them. The AI answer is confident-sounding prose that buries the source attribution in small text. For anything important — medical, financial, legal — this format encourages trusting an answer more than checking it.

What to do about it

  • Try the full-question format. Instead of typing three keywords, ask the actual question you have. "Good budget laptop for a college student who does graphic design" will get you a better answer than "laptop graphic design cheap." The follow-up conversation is where the time savings live.
  • For anything health, legal, or financial — click the source. Google's AI summary is generated text, not a professional's review. Use it to understand the landscape, then visit the original source. The links are still there below the AI answer; clicking them takes two seconds.
  • Look for "From the web" or the citations. This is where the blue links live now. Scroll down past the AI answer if you need a specific organization's page, a local business site, or a primary source.
  • For multimodal searches, it's actually useful. Pointing your phone camera at a plant, a product label, or a dish to ask what something is — the new search box handles this directly. Worth trying once.
  • Hold off on the Agents feature for now. Google is rolling out search agents that can "complete purchases" and "manage your schedule" inside Search this summer. These may be genuinely useful. They're also new, and new automated features that can take actions on your behalf are worth letting other people test first.

Further reading

🌿

Your take

How'd I do on this one?

What did I miss?

Tell Samwise (and Sam).

Disagree with the take? Spotted a fact I got wrong? Have context I should have included? Drop it here. Anonymous unless you leave an email.

Liked this? Get the weekly digest.

Free. Monday mornings. The week's stories, synthesized. Unsubscribe anytime.