Vol. 1 · Edition 025Free · No paywall

Everyone Needs a Samwise

AI news · Synthesized · Opinionated · 🌿

Feb 2026Jun 12~Jul 12
SpaceX+xAI MergeIPO: $1.77TCursor Closes
Tools & Infra
By Sam Taylor with Samwise

On SpaceX's record $75B IPO, what the 30-day acquisition clock means for builders using Cursor today, and the open question about Grok V9-Medium's actual benchmark performance

The Cursor acquisition is now happening. Grok V9 still hasn't shipped.

Source lean on this story
▲ avg

Anti-AI

00

Skeptic

02

Neutral

00

Pro (practical)

02

Pro (hyped)

00

← Anti-AI · Pro-AI →

SpaceX is public. This happened four days ago.

June 12, Nasdaq, ticker SPCX, IPO price $135 per share. First-day close: $161.11, up 19.3%. Intraday market cap crossed $2 trillion. $75 billion raised — the largest IPO in history by roughly a factor of two over Saudi Aramco's $35.4 billion in 2019. SpaceX is now the sixth-largest publicly traded company in the US by market capitalization. SPCX was trading at $177.99 as of June 15, the day I'm writing this.

The part that matters for this audience: the Cursor acquisition clock is now running.

$75B
SpaceX raised in its June 12 Nasdaq IPO — the largest in history

→ Source: CNBC

The deal structure, quick recap

SpaceX has the right to acquire Anysphere (Cursor) for $60 billion, approximately 30 days after the IPO — placing the expected close around July 12. Alternative in the deal: SpaceX pays $10 billion for collaborative work and stops there. A $10 billion breakup fee is attached.

SpaceX merged with xAI in February 2026 in a deal Elon Musk valued at roughly $1.25 trillion. xAI runs Grok. So the entity acquiring Cursor is, in operational terms, the same entity that builds Grok — and Cursor is currently one of the primary distribution channels where that model will be pushed.

67% of Fortune 500 companies use Cursor. That's the reach xAI is buying.

The Grok V9-Medium problem

Here's where the article gets uncomfortable.

Elon Musk confirmed on June 5 that Grok V9-Medium completed training — 1.5 trillion parameters, roughly three times the current production model. The model was trained on Cursor workflow data: real developer sessions, not synthetic code tasks. Public release was targeting mid-June.

It's June 16. V9-Medium has no published public benchmarks.

Cursor's model stack: before vs after acquisition
CurrentPost-acquisition (expected)
Primary coding modelClaude via AnthropicGrok V9-Medium (xAI-controlled)
Secondary routingGPT-5.5 via OpenAITBD
Model selectionUser-configurableLikely remains configurable
Financial incentiveNeutral routingxAI incentivized to push Grok
V9-Medium SWE-benchN/ANot yet published as of June 16

The "post-acquisition" column above is inference, not confirmed. xAI hasn't published a model routing plan for Cursor post-close. What is confirmed: xAI trained V9-Medium on Cursor data and is rolling Grok into Tesla and X as a distribution play. The financial logic for pushing Grok through Cursor is obvious.

The thing you can't verify yet: whether Grok V9-Medium is actually as good at coding as Claude Fable 5 (currently offline, US government export order) or GPT-5.5. No independent benchmark numbers exist for V9-Medium. Grok Build 0.1, a smaller dedicated coding model in API beta since May 29, is a separate product — a signal of direction, not a substitute for V9-Medium benchmarks.

Why Musk's timeline track record matters here

The mid-June target for V9-Medium has slipped. Four days into the second half of June, no release. I don't think V9-Medium is broken — training a 1.5T model on new data is a multi-month project, and "mid-June" was always aspirational. But it means the Cursor acquisition closes in about four weeks, and the model xAI intends to push through Cursor post-acquisition hasn't shipped yet, let alone been evaluated against the models it's replacing.

Or maybe it ships this week. I could be wrong about that. But even if it does, four weeks isn't much runway for builders to evaluate a 1.5T parameter model against their actual production workloads before it becomes the default routing in their IDE.

Source spread

Pros & cons

What's real:

  • SpaceX's IPO was a genuine success. $75B raised at a $1.77T valuation. The company has the capital to execute the Cursor acquisition without financing risk. There's no scenario where this deal falls apart for financial reasons now.
  • Grok Build 0.1 in API beta is a real signal. It's a dedicated coding model in the xAI lineup, different from V9-Medium, and it suggests xAI is building a coherent developer tooling strategy rather than just slapping Grok labels on things.
  • If V9-Medium performs as advertised on coding tasks — and the Cursor workflow training data is a genuinely interesting differentiator — the Grok-in-Cursor story could be competitive. The bet that real developer workflow data beats synthetic training data is not obviously wrong.

What deserves a side-eye:

  • V9-Medium has no published benchmarks. Mid-June came and went. The deal closes in four weeks. Builders who care about model routing in their IDE should want published numbers before the default changes, not after.
  • xAI has a financial incentive to push Grok through Cursor. That's not a conspiracy — it's how business works. But it means user-configurable model routing may face quiet friction over time even if it stays officially available.
  • Claude Fable 5 is currently offline (US DoC export order, June 12). Cursor's primary model routing is in an unusual state right now. The comparison baseline for V9-Medium's launch is murkier than it would normally be.

What builders need to know

  • The Cursor acquisition closes around July 12, barring the $10B work-for-hire alternative. If you use Cursor in production, this is your planning horizon.
  • Grok V9-Medium still has no public benchmarks as of June 16. Before the deal closes, publish your own comparison: your real workloads, Claude or GPT vs Grok Build 0.1, documented results. You want data when routing decisions get made.
  • Grok Build 0.1 is in API beta now at grok-build-0.1. It's a smaller dedicated coding model, not V9-Medium. Worth running against your stack for directional signal.
  • Watch for V9-Medium's public launch and independent evaluations on SWE-bench Verified and LiveCodeBench. If xAI doesn't publish against these standard benchmarks on launch day, ask why.
  • User-configurable model routing in Cursor is currently available and should remain available post-acquisition. Build with that assumption, but verify it explicitly in the new terms when the acquisition closes.
  • Anthropic's Fable 5 and Mythos 5 remain offline (US DoC export order). If you were relying on Fable 5 as your Cursor fallback, that baseline is currently unavailable. Plan around Claude Sonnet 4.6 or GPT-5.5 for now.

Further reading

🌿

Liked this? Get the weekly digest.

Free. Monday mornings. The week's stories, synthesized. Unsubscribe anytime.

Your take

How'd I do on this one?

What did I miss?

Tell Samwise (and Sam).

Disagree with the take? Spotted a fact I got wrong? Have context I should have included? Drop it here. Anonymous unless you leave an email.